<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Sun, 27 May 2012 13:06:45 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>English</title><link>http://vsamurai.com/english/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 07:28:24 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>ESXi 5 on an Apple Mac Mini</title><category>Home Lab</category><category>apple</category><category>labs</category><category>vmware</category><dc:creator>Christopher Wells</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 19:33:11 +0000</pubDate><link>http://vsamurai.com/english/2012/5/21/esxi-5-on-an-apple-mac-mini.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">622310:7235158:16376695</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://vsamurai.com/storage/post-images/mac_mini.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1337624486402" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>I have been looking to refresh my home lab environment for some time now. Since I moved into a rental townhouse upon my move to NC, I have had power issues when my home lab is 100% powered-on. A couple of times, I have even tripped the breaker entirely. Between my desktop machine, (2) HP Proliant ML110 G5s, a Netgear ReadyNAS NVX, and (2) Netgear ReadyNAS Duos, it's just too much load for a single breaker to handle; let alone the cost of powering the whole thing.</p>
<p>I had my eye on the <strong>Apple Mac Mini 2011 w/Lion Server </strong>since it was released as this would make the perfect low power and low noise option. This model comes with a quad core CPU that supports up to 16GB of RAM and uses 85W (peak) of power per machine. The current servers I have are dual core, and are all limited at 8GB of RAM. The idea was to replace the (4) 8GB servers that I have with (2) Apple Mac Minis running ESXi 5.0U1. I had some minor concerns about the fact that the Mini has only a single NIC, but I don't really foresee 100% utilization, but if I do, I always have the older servers available for more capacity. Perhaps someone will come up with a Thunderbolt to Ethernet adapter to address this bottleneck.</p>
<p>When the new Mac Mini was released someone tried to get ESXi installed and running but had some issues getting the Gigabit on-board NIC to be recognized in ESXi. Apparently the driver for the Broadcom NIC that Apple uses didn't get included in the release of ESXi 5. As a result, I put my plans on the back burner, thinking that someone would eventually figure it out.</p>
<p>Well, finally it appears as though someone got it working with ESXi, by installing a custom VIB from VMware for the infamous Broadcom NIC (<strong><a href="http://downloads.vmware.com/d/details/dt_esxi50_broadcom_tg3_3_120h_v50_2/dHRAYnRAd2piZHAlZA==">found here</a></strong>). This was posted on the following <strong><a href="http://paraguin.com/2012/01/10/the-mac-mini-vmware-esxi-5-server-part-1-research/">site</a></strong> back in January (I have been busy; what can I say). The blog post was pointed out to me on Google+ by my blogger friend &amp; fellow Tech Field Day delegate: <strong><a href="http://twitter.com/shannonsnowden">Shannon Snowden</a> </strong>over at <strong><a href="http://virtualizationinformation.com">Virtualization Information</a></strong>.</p>
<p>Since he was also successful in getting it working, I thought I would take a stab at it. I did have a couple of pre-requisites around what I wanted to accomplish by doing this, however.</p>
<p>I wanted to have the ability to host nested ESXi servers on the machine, so that I could have an all-in-one ESXi lab cluster. In order to realistically accomplish this, I needed to have an SSD in the machine, one with high IOPS performance and high enough capacity to hold all the VMs. I currently use an OCZ Vertex 2 in my desktop machine, and decided that I would do a quick search to see the current deals at Newegg, Amazon, etc. By coincidence, Newegg had a deal (which has since expired) for a 240GB OCZ Vertex 3 with a free 32GB OCZ Onyx for $249.99 (before $20 rebate). They also had the 2x8GB Corsair SODIMMS that others have installed successfully in the Mac Mini for $99. I decided on picking up 2 of each in anticipation of a 2-node build.</p>
<p>The parts arrived 2 days later, so I took a lunch trip over to the Apple store and picked up the Mac Mini w/Lion Server ($939 with my NetApp discount ;) After returning, I spent 30m disassembling the Mini and swapping out the RAM and 2 HDDs. It was a bit tricky getting at the 2nd HDD, but well-documented on <strong><a href="http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Installing-Mac-Mini-Mid-2011-Hard-Drive-Replacement/6422/1#.T7qXSo5NnhY">iFixIt</a></strong>. After getting the hardware in working order, I performed the install of ESXi on the 32GB drive and reserved the 240GB drive as a local VMFS datastore. In addition, I added the required Broadcom NIC driver. It only ended up taking 1-2hr total, including the hardware upgrade, to get everything working. Once it was proven that everything worked, I picked up another Mini last Fri. and performed the same operation; this time it went much faster. By about 10PM on Fri. night, I had a working, silent, 2-node ESXi cluster.</p>
<p>I did run into one issue that I wanted to point out... Upon powering on the 2nd machine and starting the ESXi installer, I noticed some pretty sluggish performance. The installer was taking longer to got through the motions than it had for the initial build. I thought maybe I had a memory issue or another problem. As I was moving the machine around on my desk, I noticed that there was an unreasonable amount of heat coming off the aluminum casing. I removed the cover/foot from the bottom and realized that the power connector for the fan wasn't fully-seated and thus the fan was not spinning. As this is the last component to get re-installed after replacing the HDDs, it is somewhat difficult to ensure that it is re-seated properly. Also, it's hard to hear whether the fan is spinning as the Mini is so quiet. Please check it carefully before closing the access panel, so you don't make the same mistake. Thankfully, it doesn't appear that any harm was done and the sytem is running much better and much cooler now.</p>
<p>Once I had everything in working physical order, I decided to start working on getting the virtual layer set up to suit my needs. I started by moving my AD, MSSQL and vCenter VMs temporarily to the local SSD storage to get an idea of the performance. It was pretty good, however, I wanted to make sure that I wasn't isolating those important VMs on local storage so I then moved them back to my iSCSI datastore on the ReadyNAS, where they now sit. This allowed me to use Update Manager to update the ESXi installs with all the latest patches, etc.</p>
<p>I can report that the Minis are working quite well and were successful at performing a "burn in" over the weekend. I haven't done any real load testing on them yet, but I do plan on getting the nested ESXi builds started this week. I will update you all with another blog post with the results of that testing.</p>
<p>Finally, I decided that this is such a cool use case of nested ESXi and pefect hardware for a home lab that I submitted an abstract last week for <strong>VMworld</strong> to talk about how to implement and get the most out of it to learn ESXi and have a very portable VMware lab solution. Please stay tuned as the public voting comes available. I would love to have you vote so that I can expose the importance and usefulness of a home lab to more and potential VMware professionals. Also stay tuned for more on the Mac Mini as I perform additional testing.</p>
<p>Thanks, as always, for reading!</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://vsamurai.com/english/rss-comments-entry-16376695.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>VMware vExpert 2012</title><category>General</category><category>awards</category><category>vexpert</category><category>vmware</category><category>vmworld</category><dc:creator>Christopher Wells</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 03:03:16 +0000</pubDate><link>http://vsamurai.com/english/2012/4/15/vmware-vexpert-2012.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">622310:7235158:15862161</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://vsamurai.com/storage/post-images/vexpert2012_logo.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1337176142485" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>I am again pleased to annouce my renewed induction into the exclusive group that  is the vExperts! Many thanks to <strong>John Troyer</strong> &amp; <strong>Alex Maier</strong> and all of the  <strong>VMware</strong> staff that helped determine the inductees for <strong>2012</strong>.</p>
<p>Now that I am working at a vendor, <strong>NetApp</strong>, it is all the more difficult to make it into this exclusive group of experts. It just means I need to continue to elevate my game to continue helping those in the field and spread the word about VMware and its growing catalog of offerings.</p>
<p>I am also pleased to annouce that my teammates, <strong><a href="https://twitter.com/#!/chrisgeb">Chris Gebhardt</a></strong> and <strong><a href="https://twitter.com/#!/that1guynick">Nick Howell</a></strong> made the list again this year along with me. I can assure you that the three of us, and the rest of our team have very exciting plans in store for <strong>VMworld</strong> this year. Stay tuned here for more as we slowly reveal our plans!</p>
<p>It has been a <strong>transitional year</strong> for me thus far, especially with an <strong>overseas move</strong> for myself and my family as well as the ins and outs of starting a <strong>new role</strong> with a <strong>new company</strong>. I am enjoying the transition so far, but still look forward to <strong>normalcy</strong> as I find my place here.</p>
<p>Thanks as always to my readers, colleagues and friends for you <strong>encouragement</strong> and <strong>guidance</strong>!</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://vsamurai.com/english/rss-comments-entry-15862161.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Japan Earthquake Aftermath - Revisited</title><category>Business Continuity</category><category>Disaster Recovery</category><category>NetApp</category><category>VMware</category><category>bc</category><category>daas</category><category>dr</category><category>netapp</category><category>vcloud</category><category>vmware</category><dc:creator>Christopher Wells</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:28:02 +0000</pubDate><link>http://vsamurai.com/english/2012/4/10/japan-earthquake-aftermath-revisited.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">622310:7235158:15789710</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Today I am feeling a bit of the same emotion that I felt in the months after the great earthquake that my family and I, along with the people of Japan, experienced just over a year ago. The reason for this is something that I saw posted when I woke up this morning regarding how <strong>SoftBank</strong>, with the help of <strong>NetApp</strong>, helped Japan and its citizens in the recovery effort. <em>See video</em>...</p>
<p><object id="flashObj" width="450" height="285" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0"><param name="movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="flashVars" value="videoId=1546073064001&linkBaseURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.netapp.com%2Fus%2Fcampaigns%2Fbuilton%2F%3FvideoId%3D1546073064001%26showVid%3Dy%26videoInfo%3Dvideo-1546073064001-1546073064001%26v%3Ds%23story3&playerID=626960739001&playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAPLMHdIE~,XTYhbdaYQW4Z2Tgc2cPz13WYp7wtd-eR&domain=embed&dynamicStreaming=true" /><param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoId=1546073064001&linkBaseURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.netapp.com%2Fus%2Fcampaigns%2Fbuilton%2F%3FvideoId%3D1546073064001%26showVid%3Dy%26videoInfo%3Dvideo-1546073064001-1546073064001%26v%3Ds%23story3&playerID=626960739001&playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAPLMHdIE~,XTYhbdaYQW4Z2Tgc2cPz13WYp7wtd-eR&domain=embed&dynamicStreaming=true" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="450" height="285" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true" swLiveConnect="true" allowScriptAccess="always" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object></p>
<p>My experience, which I talked about <a href="http://www.vsamurai.com/english/2011/3/13/japan-my-earthquake-experience.html">here</a>, mirrors some of the same things referred to by SoftBank. Imagine not being able to travel to the office due to transportation being completely shut down. Or rolling blackouts meaning that throughout the day, if the trains happened to be running, not knowing whether they would still be running once it was time to return home. Or not having heat or cooling in the office to be able to work comfortably. Or food at the convenience store or any other number of basic necessities being available. Or gas to drive your car...</p>
<p>Even though cloud was not intended for the purpose of "working from home", as with any disruptive and innovative technology, it is interesting to see what technology<strong> </strong>is capable of in times of need or times of urgency or even new ways to use a technology that were never dreamed of before. Think about the pure energy-saving aspects of virtualization and cloud and expand that to energy savings from working remotely and you can clearly see what's possible.</p>
<p>I do remember hearing stories of how SoftBank was giving away its services and donating money to help in the recovery. I commend them for their efforts. I can say that I am even more proud that they happened to do it using NetApp technologies.</p>
<p>As you may know from reading my <a href="http://www.vsamurai.com/english/2011/3/23/real-life-dr-bc-with-vmware-srm.html">blog entry</a> from a year ago... I had the experience, as a customer, of using technologies from NetApp and VMware to failover critical services in our infrastructure during the disaster. This only scratched the service of what transformative technologies can accomplish, as evidenced by SoftBank's success. Look to the past and present and you will see further evidence of how <strong>technology saves lives</strong>. Look to the future and you can see the potential and the promise of cloud computing. Exciting times indeed!</p>
<p><em><strong>Links:</strong></em></p>
<p>Executive Summary (<a href="http://www.netapp.com/us/library/datasheets/ds-3295.html">PDF</a>)</p>
<p>Technical Case Study (<a href="http://www.netapp.com/us/library/customer-stories/cs-softbank-na-135-0312.html">PDF</a>)</p>
<p><a href="https://communities.netapp.com/community/netapp-blogs/netapp_japan/blog/2012/04/09/a-story-behind-softbank-epic-story">The story behind SoftBank's Epic Story</a></p>
<p><a href="https://communities.netapp.com/community/netapp-blogs/dave/blog/2012/04/10/a-disaster-can-teach-us-what-s-possible">Dave Hitz's blog</a></p>
<p><a href="https://communities.netapp.com/community/netapp-blogs/exposed/blog/2012/04/10/personally-epic">Val Bercovici's blog</a></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://vsamurai.com/english/rss-comments-entry-15789710.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>VMware Zimbra vs. Microsoft Exchange - Follow-up</title><category>E-mail</category><category>Zimbra</category><category>exchange</category><category>vmware</category><category>zimbra</category><dc:creator>Christopher Wells</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 03:18:41 +0000</pubDate><link>http://vsamurai.com/english/2012/3/21/vmware-zimbra-vs-microsoft-exchange-follow-up.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">622310:7235158:15536705</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I am truly excited by the response to my<strong> Zimba vs. Exchange <a href="http://www.vsamurai.com/english/2012/2/29/vmware-zimbra-vs-microsoft-exchange.html">post</a></strong> from a couple weeks back. I would like to thank my readers and especially those who commented for their valued feedback. The response thus far shows that there is definite interest in alternatives to <strong>Exchange</strong> for e-mail and collaboration needs at various industries and organization types.</p>
<p>I believe is important to be open to competing viewpoints as well, and it is this type of interaction that causes software organizations to sit up and take notice at what they are doing right or wrong and how they can improve to expand their offerings to a wider audience and to improve the customer experience.</p>
<p>That said, I would like to point you to a post <a href="http://eightwone.com/2012/03/21/thoughts-on-vmware-zimbra-vs-microsoft-exchange/">here</a> &amp; <a href="http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/davestork/archive/2012/03/21/thoughts-on-vmware-zimbra-vs-microsoft-exchange.aspx">here</a> co-written by two obvious proponents of <strong>Exchange</strong>, by the names of <strong>Michel de Rooij</strong> and <strong>Dave Stork</strong>. They put forth a rebuttal that can serve as a response (albeit somewhat flawed) to my arguments in favor of <strong>Zimbra</strong>. <em>The comments on my post, as well as those on their sites, should be reviewed as well, as they provide constructive feedback on the validity of our arguments on both sides of the fence.</em></p>
<p>I welcome this sort of feedback and look forward to continuing the conversation throughout the <strong>Zimbra</strong> product life-cycle as well as similar or competing offerings from <strong>VMware</strong>, <strong>Microsoft</strong> and their partners.</p>
<p>The fact that I got a response of this magnitude not only shows that there is significant interest in <strong>Zimbra</strong>, but also that <strong>Exchange</strong> proponents feel a need to defend their territory proves that <strong>Zimbra</strong> is on their radar. I think this bodes well for competition in a <strong>Microsoft-dominated</strong> world! "No publicity is bad publicity", so they say...</p>
<p><em>Thanks for reading!</em></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://vsamurai.com/english/rss-comments-entry-15536705.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Job Opportunity - Technical Marketing Engineer</title><category>NetApp</category><category>Off-topic</category><category>jobs</category><category>netapp</category><category>technical marketing</category><category>vmware</category><dc:creator>Christopher Wells</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 14:42:11 +0000</pubDate><link>http://vsamurai.com/english/2012/3/18/job-opportunity-technical-marketing-engineer.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">622310:7235158:15480634</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Monday will mark my 1st six months at <strong>NetApp</strong>. I started with the title of "<strong>Virtualization Solutions Architect</strong>" which meant that I was focused on <em>any</em> virtualization solution on top of NetApp products. Management has changed my group's focus a bit and the team I'm on is now laser-focused on any and all <em>VMware</em> solutions on NetApp hardware and software platforms. My title is officially "<strong>Technical Marketing Engineer</strong>", but "<strong>VMware Solutions Architect</strong>" or "<strong>Technical Marketing Architect</strong>" sound nice as well...</p>
<p>As such, the team is growing and we are currently looking for someone in <strong>Silicon Valley</strong> (or willing to relocate) to help us expand our relationship with VMware in a <strong>Technical Marketing</strong> capacity. Optimally the candidate should have a strong background in VMware (i.e. <strong>VCAP/VCDX</strong>) and also a deep understanding of NetApp's value proposition and uniqueness in VMware environments. You will be working on-site at VMware's <strong>Palo Alto</strong> offices and spending a significant amount of time meeting with PMs and engineers at VMware in addition to conferences, VMUGs, EBCs, and technical content delivery.</p>
<p>I invite you to apply if you fit this description and if this role sounds interesting to you. It will be an exciting role with direct impact on the future of NetApp and VMware's partnership.</p>
<p><em>See details of the requisition below:</em></p>
<p><strong>18773BR</strong></p>
<p><span> <span> </span> <span> <span> </span> </span> <span> </span></span></p>
<p><strong>Job Description</strong></p>
<p>At NetApp the Technical  Marketing team is a critical part of enabling our customers to deploy  varying workloads on VMware vSphere hypervisors and in cloud constructs  by focusing on performance, scalability and security. NetApp's  commitment to deep integrations and extensions enable customers to  quickly adopt and broaden their virtualization initiatives, and we have a  rare opening for a candidate who is obsessed with making the cloud a  better place to be for enterprises of all sizes. As part of this highly  elite TME team, you will work extensively with our key partner to drive  technical vision, test and identify new use cases, and identify constant  improvements in our growing integrations and extensions. Equally  important will be your ability to create and mature relationships across  corporate and engineering team boundaries within NetApp and our Partner  organizations.<br /> <br />As a Technical Marketing Engineer at NetApp you  will work with technologies that will shape the industry and our  partnership for the foreseeable future, including infrastructure  optimization, virtualization, enterprise applications, Virtual Desktop  Infrastructure (VDI), and data center consolidation. Through working  with our partner and these technologies you will develop a bird's-eye  view of where the IT world is headed, where our partners are focused and  provide keen insight back to our engineering organization.<br /> <br />We  are seeking an individual who has a deep-level familiarity with  deploying, tuning and removing bottlenecks in enterprise applications,  especially Microsoft (such as Exchange, SharePoint), virtual desktop  environments, and other business applications. Prior experience at a  large enterprise in a senior IT role is desirable. An understanding of  software design constructs and demonstrable experience translating  abstract engineering constructs into concrete marketing collateral is  required.  In short, we want someone who is comfortable with both  engaging and driving engineering initiatives, writing and delivering  amazing presentations and working with partners and customers.</p>
<p><strong>Essential  Functions: </strong> - You will influence technology strategy for current and  future virtualization projects. - You will be expected to forge  relationships and become a bridge between key teams at NetApp and  VMware.<br /> - You will influence and communicate strategic  directions to management for adoption.- You will lead projects and be  accountable for project deliverables working with cross-functional and  business unit teams and lead inter-department cross functional teams.   This may include researching, proposing, managing and designing Partner  integrations highlighting NetApp technologies.<br /> - You will be a  Subject Matter Expert in a few technologies across the industry and  customer landscape influencing at the Director and C-executive level.   As the breadth of NetApp strategic technology interests broadens, you  will continue to build your expertise with continued internal and  external education and collaboration with industry experts.- You will  identify gaps in product/process and make proactive suggestions for  improvement.<br /> - Influence the strategic direction of activities  with your Team, Project Stakeholders, Product Management, Partners, Sr  Director and VP. This role often interfaces with Technical Directors,  other Business Units and industry contacts and thus you will need to  build productive relationships and networks.<br /> - You will be  responsible for creating and presenting technical and strategic content  to customers and partners and gather feedback to influence product and  solution offerings.  Interpret field feedback to generate strategic  direction.<br /> - You will be responsible for identifying and  managing the development of collateral in your focused areas of  technical expertise to highlight best practices and NetApp's value  proposition.- You will collaborate on strategy with senior product  management to inspire strategic products, solutions or reference  architecture roadmaps and plans.  This includes participating in  cross-functional teams to develop product and solution roadmaps.Job  RequirementsKey Requirements:- Ability to plan, outline and publish  professional technical documents on a defined timeline.<br /> -  Ability to forge relationships across organizational boundaries  (internal and external) with a focus on influencing individuals and  teams through clear and effective communications and strong  relationships.<br /> - Act as an ambassador for NetApp through the  understanding and articulation of our requirements and interests with  our partner community.<br /> - Ability to communicate in a clear and  concise professional manner, tailored to the appropriate audience;  including both verbal and written communications.<br /> - Proven experience leading across business unit teams with strong influencing skills at the Senior and Executive level.<br /> - Previous experience fostering and nurturing a collaborative  environment capable of working on complex issues where analysis of  situations or data requires an in-depth evaluation and effort across  multiple teams (internal and external).<br /> - Previous technical  experience with one or more enterprise applications or technologies,  such as Microsoft (Exchange, Office, SharePoint, SQL, or others),  VMware, NetApp, SAP, Oracle or other business applications.<br /> - Prior experience identifying performance bottlenecks in storage infrastructures.<br /> - Prior experience as a TME is desirable, but as a substitute we  will consider other successful technical experience from the enterprise  world -- software engineering, IT or QA.<br /> - Powershell scripting experience is a plus.<br /> - Experience with vCloud Director is a big plus.<br /> - Experience using performance analysis tools, such as one or more  of the following:◦ Wireshark, tcpdump, ESXTop, etc.     ◦ WAN/network  simulation tools<br /> - Fluency in PowerPoint, Word and Excel is required.<br /> - Active member of the virtualization social media space (blogging, podcasts, tweeting, etc.)<br /> - Up to 25% travel, such as product launch events, customer visits, and industry events.<br /> - Internal drive and the desire to do what it takes to win!</p>
<p><strong>Key  Success Indicators:</strong>- You must be willing to consider and apply new  perspectives and creative approaches for tasks that are often  unstructured and the issues addressed are less defined.<br /> - You  must rely on and apply attained experiences and knowledge in solving  problems that are complex in scope and scale requiring in-depth  evaluation. - You must demonstrate good judgment in solving problems as  well as identifying problems in advance, and proposing solutions.<br /> - You must work effectively with software engineers, alliance  managers, marketing teams and field engineers to drive awareness of  NetApp's initiatives and translate partner roadmaps into tangible  integration opportunities within NetApp.<br /> - You must successfully  work with limited supervision and direction and accept that you will  operate and drive strategic results without boundaries and set  priorities independently.- You must be a proactive contributor,  influencer, and subject matter expert.<br /> - You must demonstrate favorable results through regular leadership and influencing others.<br /> - You will be expected to act as a mentor to both senior and junior  Technical Marketing Engineers.Education and ExperienceEducation &amp;  Experience Requirements:- A minimum of 8 years in a technical role, such  as Technical Marketing, Software Engineering, QA or IT in the  virtualization industry.<br /> - B.S. in Computer Science, Engineering or related field (M.S. and/or MBA highly desirable).<br /> - Industry certifications required:<br /> VCP5 and VCAP (VCDX highly desirable)<br /> - Demonstrated ability to successfully complete multiple and complex technical projects<br /> - Writing, communications, influencing and presentation skills</p>
<p><em><strong>Apply <a href="http://www.netapp.com/us/careers/">Here</a></strong></em></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://vsamurai.com/english/rss-comments-entry-15480634.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>VMware Zimbra vs. Microsoft Exchange</title><category>End-user Computing</category><category>VMware</category><category>Zimbra</category><category>end-user computing</category><category>exchange</category><category>netapp</category><category>tier-1 apps</category><category>vmware</category><category>zimbra</category><dc:creator>Christopher Wells</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:51:46 +0000</pubDate><link>http://vsamurai.com/english/2012/2/29/vmware-zimbra-vs-microsoft-exchange.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">622310:7235158:15127765</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Introduction</strong></p>
<p>In this post I would like to propose the idea that <strong>VMware Zimbra Collaboration Server</strong> can serve as a drop-in replacement for <strong>Microsoft Exchange</strong> in Enterprise environments of all sizes. I would also propose that Zimbra is better suited for multi-tenant ISP deployments than Exchange. Let's discuss the pros and cons of Zimbra and give you the background to consider Zimbra for your next e-mail deployment or customer engagement.</p>
<p><strong>Background</strong></p>
<p>Technically, VMware Zimbra is part of VMware's <strong>End-user Computing</strong> catalog, but I would also consider it as a good example of a <strong>Tier-1</strong> application, once deployed. E-mail is becoming so critical to the operations of any size business that it needs to be designed, implemented and maintained with the same level of care as any other Tier-1 app.</p>
<p><strong>Benefits</strong> <strong>Overview</strong></p>
<p>That said, the ease with which backup and restore can be performed in Zimbra far outweighs the capabilities of Exchange. A good backup/restore strategy is one of the cornerstones of any Tier-1 app deployment worth its salt. Add to that the fact that Zimbra has orders of magnitude better scaling  capabilities than Exchange, all at about 50% of the price, on average.</p>
<p><strong>Storage Benefits</strong></p>
<p>Combine <strong>Zimbra</strong> with <strong>NetApp</strong> storage platforms and technologies and you will see even more efficiences around the storage required for backup, attachments, etc. (using NetApp's deduplication technology) in addition to ease of management. Snapshot technologies allow quick backups of e-mail and attachment data resulting in quick restoration when you run into issues. Cloning technologies (<strong>FlexClone</strong>) will allow you to reduce time required for upgrades by allowing staff to test upgrades with a live copy of recent production data. Replication technologies (<strong>SnapMirror</strong>) will allow you to move data backups to remote locations for disaster recovery or remote backup facilities for compliance purposes.</p>
<p><strong>General Comparisons</strong></p>
<p><em>Here are some other comparisons that can be drawn between the 2 platforms:</em></p>
<table cellspacing="15" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th style="font-size: 100%; text-align: left;">Key Features</th> <th style="text-align: left; font-size: 100%;">Exchange 2010</th> <th style="text-align: left; font-size: 100%;">ZCS 7.x</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="font-size: 90%;">Platform Architecture</span></strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 90%;">Core architecture "Extensible Storage Engine (ESE)" is over 20y old and is a non-modular .edb file which doesn't separate message and metadata, so is not conducive to tuning. Database availability group (DAG) uses components with a DNA based on Windows failover clustering, but has yet to be proven for large deployments.</span></p>
</td>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 90%;">Modular architecture offers Web 2.0 features and cloud scalability. Message and metadata are separated to allow granular tuning and optimization flexibility.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="text-align: left;">
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="font-size: 90%;">Platform Reliability &amp; Robustness</span></strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><span style="font-size: 90%;">Microsoft is considering moving the storage engine to SQL Server. <br />Microsoft has yet to prove the robustness of the new architecture.</span></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><span style="font-size: 90%;">ZCS leverages a Linux-based operating environment for greater levels of robustness using proven open source components. <br />Uptime measured in years instead of weeks.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="font-size: 90%;">Platform Scalability</span></strong></p>
</td>
<td style="text-align: left;">
<p><span style="font-size: 90%;">Exchange doesn't support the use of tiered storage, so adding more users is more costly than in Zimbra.</span></p>
</td>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 90%;">ZCS supports storage tiers and can scale to millions of users at lower cost.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="font-size: 90%;">High Availability</span></strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 90%;">DAG only provides mailbox protection, not protection for the Exchange infrastructure. <br />DAG has a learning curve and only applies to Exchange.</span></p>
</td>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 90%;">ZCS in conjunction with SRM is a proven, scalable and effective high availability solution. <br />Companies can leverage their existing HA/DR solution with ZCS.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="font-size: 90%;">Platform Extensibility</span></strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 90%;">Recommendation is to use Microsoft's proprietary shell. SOAP API has limited server access. Outlook add-ins require significant developer effort and are difficult to support.</span></p>
</td>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 90%;">SOAP API allows server access. Uses the web services framework for client access and Zimlets for integration with 3rd-party services.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="font-size: 90%;">Platform Openess</span></strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 90%;">Microsoft is a closed ecosystem. Developers cannot change or extend platform or APIs.</span></p>
</td>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 90%;">Based on open source code and extensible using open source programming languages.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="font-size: 90%;">Support of Open Standard Protocols</span></strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;">&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 90%;">Limited support for the SOAP protocol. No support for REST, CalDAV, CardDAV and ICS.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 90%;">Support of open standard protocols such as SOAP, REST, CalDAV, CardDAV and ICS.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="font-size: 90%;">Rebranding</span></strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 90%;">Outlook Web Access has only a single theme in Exchange 2010, so users cannot switch between themes.</span></p>
</td>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 90%;">Complete re-branding of the client is possible. Ajax web client has feature parity with the desktop client.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="font-size: 90%;">Web-client End-user Access</span></strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 90%;">Limited browser support for OWA.</span></p>
</td>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 90%;">Rich Ajax/HTML web client is supported on a broad range of browsers and platforms.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="font-size: 90%;">Mac Desktop</span></strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 90%;">Parity with Outlook.</span></p>
</td>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 90%;">Zimbra's desktop client is supported with Mac OS X and has feature parity with the web client.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="font-size: 90%;">Linux Desktop &amp; Server</span></strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 90%;">No Outlook client for Linux. No Exchange server for Linux.</span></p>
</td>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 90%;">Zimbra desktop functions on Linux and has complete feature parity. ZCS server components love the Linux platform.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="font-size: 90%;">Mobile Support</span></strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 90%;">Fully supports push using Microsoft's ActiveSync technology.</span></p>
</td>
<td>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 90%;">Supports ActiveSync push for calendaring and e-mail.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>vSamurai's Take</strong></p>
<p>Zimbra has been a passion of mine since I started using it back in 2006-2007. My previous company had evaluated implementing Exchange, Zimbra and a couple of other solutions. Due to our IT management and staff being huge proponents of Open Source, we decided on the Zimbra solution. I am very glad that we did. To be honest, despite the fact that we had users who were used to the Outlook client, we didn't have much pushback when we moved to Zimbra as it has full feature parity with Exchange. I expect that your results may be the similar if Zimbra is given a serious look for new e-mail implementations or during hardware/software upgrade cycles in pre-existing implementations of Exchange.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><em>Expect to hear more soon about the ins and outs of deploying Zimbra in your or your customer's environment. SaaS is here and this is just one part of VMware's End-user computing strategy, so look for more in the future from them as well.</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em><br /></em></strong></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://vsamurai.com/english/rss-comments-entry-15127765.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Top Virtualization Blogs - #39</title><category>General</category><category>Off-topic</category><category>blog</category><category>netapp</category><category>virtualization</category><dc:creator>Christopher Wells</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:19:42 +0000</pubDate><link>http://vsamurai.com/english/2012/2/28/top-virtualization-blogs-39.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">622310:7235158:15224198</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I would like to thank all of my readers who voted in the annual <a href="http://vsphere-land.com/news/top-blog-2012-results.html">top virtualization blogs</a> poll. It initially took a while to get <strong>Eric Siebert</strong> to add me to the <a href="http://vlp.vsphere-land.com/">vLaunchPad</a> (Thanks Eric!), but I used my influence as one of his fellow <a href="http://techfieldday.com/">Tech Field Day</a> delegates during Tech Field Day 5 to convince him to add me to the list. I'm glad I did because this is how I found out about a lot of the virtualization blogs I followed when I was just starting out. Eric has created a valuable resource in his site.</p>
<p>My blogging on virtualization started out slowly in 2010 a few months leading up to VMworld. Last year, especially with the aftermath of the Japanese earthquake, my blogging started to pick up the pace a bit. Now I have lots of ideas for content, but I still have a ways to go.</p>
<p>I realize that the Top 25 virtualization blogs are recognized as the cream of the crop of bloggers in the virtualization community. These blogs are honored during an episode of <a href="http://www.vmwarevideos.com/vchat">vChat </a>as well as a special section in the vLaunchPad. I am ecstatic that I made <strong>#39</strong> on the list after only about 1.5y as a virtualization, cloud computing and storage blogger. I am looking to work my way up in the list this year as I get more content out that I find to be interesting for myself and others.</p>
<p>Thanks for your support and look out for more exciting content in the future!</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://vsamurai.com/english/rss-comments-entry-15224198.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>VMware Partner Exchange (PEX)</title><category>Conferences</category><category>PEX</category><category>netapp</category><category>partners</category><category>pex</category><category>vmware</category><dc:creator>Christopher Wells</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:10:07 +0000</pubDate><link>http://vsamurai.com/english/2012/2/2/vmware-partner-exchange-pex.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">622310:7235158:14837766</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>In my new role at <strong>NetApp</strong>, I am getting the opportunity to do many cool and interesting projects (goes without saying; NetApp is an <strong>awesome company</strong>!). My role so far consists of preparing technical reports concerning virtualized workloads on VMware vSphere and NetApp, giving technical input to product management, doing presentations in our EBC at RTP, etc; the list goes on...</p>
<p><strong>VMware Partner Exchange </strong>(VMware's annual partner conference) is a bit new for me. The conference takes place in Las Vegas from 2/11 - 2/16 this year. Not only will this be my first time in attendance, I will also be presenting a session during the NetApp "<strong>boot camp</strong>" on Monday, February 13th. I did a small presentation at VMworld last year, but this will be my 1st experience giving a full-length technical session on VMware and NetApp.</p>
<p>I am both anxious and excited about representing NetApp this year. I'll be speaking about <strong>Virtualizing Business Critical (Tier 1) Apps</strong> and the technical caveats required while doing so, as well as why you should consider virtualizing those apps on NetApp storage. As this is a topic that is top of mind for both VMware and NetApp, I am sure the entire boot camp will be well attended by System Engineers and Partners alike.</p>
<p>As I am a big believer in social media and crowdsourcing, here is where I ask the question... <em><strong>What do you expect from a boot camp session around Virtualizing Tier 1 Apps? </strong></em></p>
<p>I always like to involve my readers in the content I produce as much as possible and to be honest, I feel that technical presentations are more useful and the content more applicable to day-to-day interaction when I give you the information you are expecting to hear!</p>
<p>Please comment below with the pain points you are hearing when discussing the virtualizing of Tier 1 apps. Tell me what kind of pushback you are seeing from customers against virtualizing their Tier 1 apps. And of course share your experiences virtualizing Tier 1 apps so that I can learn from your experiences!</p>
<p>Thanks for your feedback! I will see a lot of you at the conference to be sure, so please drop by the session, booth or lab and introduce yourself... looking forward to it.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://vsamurai.com/english/rss-comments-entry-14837766.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Top Virtualization Blogs - Cast Your Vote!</title><category>General</category><category>Off-topic</category><category>blog</category><category>netapp</category><category>virtualization</category><dc:creator>Christopher Wells</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 07:57:47 +0000</pubDate><link>http://vsamurai.com/english/2012/2/1/top-virtualization-blogs-cast-your-vote.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">622310:7235158:14821066</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>As many of you may know, <a href="http://www.twitter.com/ericsiebert"><strong>Eric Siebert</strong></a> over at <strong><a href="http://vsphere-land.com/">vSphere Land</a></strong> holds an annual vote to determine the top blogs in the world of virtualization. He then lists the <strong>"Top 25"</strong> blogs in a special section in his <strong><a href="http://vlp.vsphere-land.com/">vLaunchpad</a> </strong>which is a page where he links to all the blogs on his radar in the virtualization "sphere" (pun intended ;).</p>
<p>I am pleased to say that my blog as well as that of my colleague, <strong><a href="http://www.twitter.com/vStewed">Vaughn Stewart</a> </strong>(<strong><a href="http://virtualstorageguy.com/">The Virtual Storage Guy</a></strong>), are on the list of about 180 nominees for best of the best for this year. I hope that you will consider casting your vote for one or both of our blogs among others who are deserving of the honor to be listed as part of the top 25.</p>
<p>We rely on your feedback and feed off it when we are spending long hours writing and researching the content which helps our customers and partners succeed on <strong>VMware</strong> and <strong>NetApp</strong>. Voting for us helps us to up our games and continue or contribution to the community. Thanks for your current and continued support!</p>
<p><strong>Get out there and vote!</strong> (<em>Voting ends on Feb. 7th</em>)</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><a href="http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/786135/Top-VMware-virtualization-blogs-2012"><img src="http://vsamurai.com/storage/post-images/vote-button.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1330097658798" alt="" /></a></span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://vsamurai.com/english/rss-comments-entry-14821066.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>VCP510: Exam Tips</title><category>Certification</category><category>certification</category><category>exam</category><category>pex</category><category>vcp</category><category>vcp510</category><category>vmware</category><dc:creator>Christopher Wells</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:16:35 +0000</pubDate><link>http://vsamurai.com/english/2012/1/26/vcp510-exam-tips.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">622310:7235158:14740592</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think it's finally time to do a blog post. I have been really busy with a couple of projects and preparation for <strong>VMware Partner Exchange</strong> next month, but those responsibilities are starting to wind down. The fruits of my labor will be publicly released or presented in the coming months, then on to more new and exciting projects!</p>
<p>By coincidence, VMware is offering the VCP and a couple other certification exams this year at PEX, so I decided to attempt an upgrade to VCP5 during the conference. I am allowing myself just enough time to reschedule the exam before end of February in case the unforeseen happens.</p>
<p>Since I haven't taken a VMware certification since late 2009 (VCP410) I feel as though I am a bit rusty when it comes to certification tests and haven't had as much hands-on product time as I would like. As such I would like to list here the study materials and resources I am using to prepare for the exam.</p>
<p>The first go-to resource (one I have used in the past) to prepare for VMware exams is courtesy of <strong><a href="http://www.trainsignal.com/VMware-vSphere-Training-Package.aspx">TrainSignal</a></strong> (<em>disclaimer; site sponsor</em>). They have an updated series of <strong>vSphere 5 training videos</strong> available that I've been viewing to get myself back up-to-speed on the features of the newest vSphere release. <strong>David Davis</strong> and <strong>Elias Khnaser</strong> are experts on vSphere and present the material in a concise and easy-to-understand manner. I am going through one lesson every day to get me ready for the exam next month.</p>
<p>The second resource that I have found to be quite valuable is <strong>Forbes Guthrie's vSphere 5.0 reference card</strong> which you can find <a href="http://vreference.com">here</a>. I plan to use this as a form of quick review whenever I have a few minutes to commit some pertinent information to memory and the information on his reference card is perfect for this type of consumption.</p>
<p>Finally, I was going to prepare a list of links to my fellow bloggers' websites who are offering material to prepare in some way for the VCP. Instead of doing that, I am posting a link to <strong>Damian Karlson's <a href="http://damiankarlson.com/2011/11/01/vmware-vcp-5-resources/">blog</a><a href="http://damiankarlson.com/2011/11/01/vmware-vcp-5-resources/"> post</a></strong> as he has an excellent list of links to all the required study material. Thanks Damian! Amazing job...</p>
<p>In the back of my mind, I am always thinking about my studies in the context of the <strong>VCP Exam Blueprint</strong>, which, for me, serves as an outline to ensure that I am covering all of the exam objectives and making sure that I haven't left anything out that might show up on the exam, so ensure that you read this over and check-off the objectives as you move through the study materials.</p>
<p>Please feel free to share any other links you have found useful here. I think a multi-pronged approach is valuable in preparing for this exam, especially given the limited time before I sit the test and the breadth of the new material that will be covered in this rendition of the exam.</p>
<p>Good luck to everyone else out there that has yet to re-certify. Only just over <strong>30 days left </strong>until the upgrade window expires!</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://vsamurai.com/english/rss-comments-entry-14740592.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>
